This site uses cookies, tags, and tracking settings to store information that help give you the very best browsing experience. Dismiss this warning
Browse Librarian Services
Browse Librarian Services
There is an old saying that a problem well put is half solved. This much is obvious. What is not so obvious is how to put the problem well. (Churchman et al., 1957) A policy problem is an unrealized need, value, or opportunity for improvement (Dunn, 2016). Public policymaking is ultimately about solving, or at least attempting to solve, policy problems. That is easy to say, but much harder to do. One of the first barriers encountered when attempting to solve problems is being able to define problems in any meaningful way that can facilitate designing adequate solutions for those problems. As noted in the previous chapter, one of the basic requirements for policy design is having a theory of causation, and that theory is fundamentally related to the definition of the policy problem. While we may be able to attach a convenient label to any problems identified within society, we need to understand more fundamentally the causes of those problems and the dynamics through which they emerge. Understanding the dynamics of the targets of the problem (Kiviniemi, 1986) will help design effective policies as well as prevent waste and unintended consequences. As we will address in greater detail in this chapter, if there were a single understanding of a problem the resolution of that problem would be simple. However, unfortunately for both academic analysts and practitioners, the world of policymaking is rarely that simple. Almost any policy problem of any consequence can be conceptualized in a variety of ways, and those alternative views of policy can produce very different ideas about how best to intervene to affect the issue. As I will be arguing throughout this and the following chapters, this conceptualization of policymaking means that the definition of policy problems is a political process, and not a technical exercise (see Hoppe, 2010). That political process of defining the problem, and through that process attempting to understand the possible means of solving the problem, is as political, albeit perhaps not so overtly so, as the processes of formulating and legitimating a solution to the problem.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Access options
Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.
Other access options
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials